SF – Speculative Fiction has great power. It allows us to
speculate in ways that other genres don’t. Do you want to want a world with a
matriarchal society? No problem. It’s only as far away as your imagination –
and your readers will suspend their disbelief as they read your book. (Or you
will suspend your disbelief as you read of just such a world in someone else’s
book.) However, place that speculation in our world, in modern day Chicago or
Toronto or Tokyo, and every page, someone will say or think, “But that’s not
how it is.” A very good writer will find a way to convince her readers, but it
won’t be easy. Place that society on the mythical world of Xrth, and such
problems disappear.
Yes, you can bend the rules slightly for stories taking
place in the present day – such as an advanced technology which gives us Jules
Verne’s submarine in “20,000 Leagues Under the Sea”, but a wholesale change in
societal mores in our world becomes quite a different story.
So, I like SF for the opportunity it gives me to explore
questions, creating worlds around them that I can use as foundations. How would
humans have to adjust to operating in a very polite society? Elizabeth Moon has
such a place in her “Vatta” series, where excessive rudeness incurs the death
penalty. What are the strengths and weaknesses of a highly formal society, with
rules for practically everything dealing with societal interaction? Simply
travel to Miller & Lee’s “Liaden Universe” to get one perspective on such a
world.
For me, these form backgrounds in which I can explore how a
character reacts to various stimuli. But it all starts with the character and
his or her problem.
What is the difference between sacrifice and suicide? If a
man in the trenches of WWI throws himself on a grenade to save the lives of his
comrades, does he do so out of love for his fellow men (sacrifice) or does he
see this as an honourable way out of a horror so immense that it seems to be
eating him whole (suicide)? Is this an act of bravery or of cowardice? In the
end, does it matter?
I found that particular question plaguing me (the difference
between sacrifice and suicide), together with its ancillary questions of
cowardice and bravery, honour and dishonour. To more fully explore it, I found
a character or two in which to embed the questions. One, Rel Panace, an injured
young man running from a gang, which wished to beat him, begins to consider
himself a coward for running. An older man, Coll, who has the brand of a coward
upon his face – for cowardice on the battlefield – saves him.
I could have set the story in today’s world, but we don’t
brand (physically) our ‘cowards’, and I wanted to explore how such a brand
might affect the wearer of it. Thus, I set the scene in a medieval world where
one could not escape the consequences of such a mark. All recognize it for what
it is and what it means. Those who wear it find themselves reviled by society –
they can’t simply disappear into the masses, move away, like someone so named
could do today.
The medieval world setting gave me added bonuses: difficulty
of travel, social hierarchy, face-to-face communication, man-to-man combat,
horses. “Horses?” you ask. With horses come stables. With stables comes manure.
With manure comes people who must muck the stables and cart the manure out of
the city. And that is the only sort of job people like Coll can get. He can’t
hide away in a room and do a job via computer modem like one could today,
meeting no one, yet earning a good wage. He must constantly face those who will
see his brand; he must accept the most menial of labour for the most menial of
wages.
Rel, the son of a noble, also cannot hide. But, mostly, he
can’t hide from himself. He can’t revenge himself on the gang with a gun, thus
he must undertake training in order to become able to defend himself in any
similar situation that might occur in the future.
Thus, my world aids me in placing my characters and their
question in a crucible from which they cannot escape. And thus, hopefully, my
readers will suspend their disbelief long enough to get entranced by my story
of Rel (coming of age) and Coll (redemption).
In the middle of writing “In the Company of Cowards”,
someone I knew did commit suicide, which threw me off writing the story for
over a year. I had immersed myself in this fictional question of ‘sacrifice or
suicide’, and life intruded with reality. There, I could observe some of the
effects of this man’s actions – both on myself, who just barely knew him, and
on another who had closer ties to both of us. It made continuing – and finally
finishing – the novel somewhat uncomfortable.
But I digress. The world – universe – I create allows me to
more readily tell the story I wish to tell. It provides a foundation and
appropriate level of technology to best suit my characters and their
adversities. Thus, I give my thanks to the SF genre for this boon.
No comments:
Post a Comment